An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock
()
or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
The goals of this Community are to facilitate knowledge sharing across the acquisition community and to serve as the central clearinghouse for service acquisition policy and guidance information, training opportunities and best practices to support both the Defense Acquisition Workforce and the DoD workforce performing services acquisition functions.
SRRB assesses the Mission Need, Strategic Alignment, Issues and Risks, Workforce Analysis, Relationship to other Requirements, Projected Cost, Prioritization, Contract and Work Functions (see DoD Handbook of Contract Function Checklists for Service Acquisitions), Metrics.
Comprehensive reviews (as opposed to individual requirements) enhance the quality of requirements prioritization and services requirements risk assessments
MFTs: Track SRRB approval and SRRB Chair guidance/mandates and include in the Acquisition Strategy
The Department of the Air Forces uses a Requirements Approval Document (RAD) process described in DAFI 63-138.
A RAD is required before a Dept. of the Air Force organization may establish an inter-agency agreement (see Interagency Acquisitions) to fund a requirement.
Placing Category Management into Dept. of Navy (DON) Acquisition Policies Raises Awareness/Compliance
SRRBs will be used to help the Department identify the best methodology for forecasting budget needs for service contracts across Future Years Defense Program. (Defense Pricing, Contracting, and Acquisition Policy)
Department of the Air Force, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, and USSOCOM have established a Program Executive Office (PEO) or a similar structure, to provide oversight of services acquisitions. This approach enables achievement of efficiencies across the organization, increased acquisition of services expertise, and standardization.
DARPA has initiated the "Bringing Classified Innovation to Defense and Government Systems" (BRIDGES) program, helping small businesses obtain Facilities Clearances. BRIDGES aims to accommodate companies, that demonstrate they can provide innovation and value to the DoD, with the means to obtain a facility clearance and interact directly with DoD customers at classified levels.
Reliance on Defense Acquisition University (DAU) for training on services acquisition. DAU's Mission Assistance services provide organization-specific services acquisition training, and in certain instances, have DAU instructors embedded in the component to meet their training needs. Strategic partnerships with DAU have enabled organizations to train their non-acquisition personnel.
Department of the Air Force, Washington Headquarters Services, Defense Logistics Agency, and Defense Health Agency have established Centers of Excellence for services acquisition support, providing a central location for expert advice and insight for services multifunctional teams.
Department of the Air Force and the Defense Health Agency have mandated use of certified Program Managers for certain Services Category (S-CAT) Programs categories. This requirement ensures skillful oversight of an organization's largest services acquisitions, similar to other programs within the Adaptive Acquisition Framework.
To maximize contract awards to small businesses, numerous components touted their outreach to the public, to include external-facing websites for small businesses interested in doing business with DoD. These websites include, but are not limited to, forecasted awards, tools on how to do business with the Department, notices of industry days and other outreach events.
Given continuing use of assisted acquisition and fluctuating service fees, one component negotiated an organization-wide flat percentage fee for assisted acquisitions. This resulted in cost savings and allowed for consistent outyear budgeting.
Use of automation and business tools to better manage services acquisitions, to include their Services Requirements Review Boards (SRRBs). These tools yield efficiencies, enable resource tracking, and streamline collaboration.
Defense Threat Reduction Agency and Defense Intelligence Agency use automated tools for integrating and aligning their SRRBs with the Planning, Programming, Budgeting & Execution (PPBE) process.
Definition of Best Practices: Best practices, as defined in the Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 37.501, are techniques that agencies may use to help detect problems in the acquisition, management and administration of service contracts. For DoD, the Services Acquisition Pathwayis a great start to learn about the DoD 7-Step SA process as is DAU's Service Acquisition Mall. For federal civilian agencies, see Steps to Performance-Based Acquisition (SPBA).
Pathway Gates. Select each for Best Practices and Lessons Learned.
Industry Best Practices are unique and innovative ways industry makes sound business decisions and contracts for services they need. Best Practices are not legal documents, but may be viewed as persuasive guidance in the management and administration of government contracts.
Peer Review Checklist for Small Business. Used to conduct a pre-award peer review of the acquisition documents (solicitation, acquisition plan, and source selection plan)
Back to Basics (BtB) BTB significantly streamlined the certification framework and re-focused training resources for the Defense Acquisition Workforce.
Want to Preview DAU On Line Training courses? Select Preview Training
DAU Credentials. DAU deployed the first four credentials in FY2020, including two Acquisition of Services credentials. There are 60+ credentials available!
DAU Partnerships. Defense Acquisition University works with over fifty external colleges and universities in granting credit to workforce members who have completed DAU courses. Partnerships provide opportunities to maximize academic accomplishments by receiving credit for DAU courses toward an undergraduate, graduate, or certificate program.
DAU Equivalency Program. The Defense Acquisition University (DAU) provides the opportunity for other organizations (colleges and universities, DoD schools, other federal agencies, commercial vendors, and professional societies) to offer courses, programs or certifications which DAU will accept as equivalent to one or more DAU courses if, upon evaluation of the organization's materials and standards, they adequately address the DAU course learning outcomes for a select DAU course(s).
Credentials for DoD Acquisition and Non-Acquisition Workforce Performing Services Acquisitions
Total CLPs
CACQ 001 Services Acquisition Team Member: Non-Acquisition Workforce
39
CACQ 002 Services Acquisition Team Member: Acquisition Workforce
Services Acquisition Workshop (SAW) WSM 012. The SAW is typically a 3-4 four-day workshop for an intact MFT conducted at team's location using the team's documentation. It is a facilitated, hands-on workshop designed to help the MFT work through the seven-step service acquisition process. For more information, see DAU's SAW Talking Paper.
Work Statement Workshop (SOW, SOO, PWS) WSM 009. Provides an overview of the function of the Work Statement in the acquisition process and a procedure for planning, developing, and writing Work Statements.
Surveillance reports provide a basis for communicating interim contractor performance or identified problems. A recent finding of the DoDIG was that CORs were not submitting surveillance reports in accordance with their Designation Letter. (See Audit of the Oversight of ENCORE III Information Technology Service Task Orders (DODIG-2023-067)) DoDI 5000.72 requires CORs to submit surveillance reports to communicate contractor performance to contracting officers. For timely surveillance reports, a monthly report is desirable and should be in the COR Designation Letter. CORs need to report performance problems immediately because many remedies are time sensitive and delays may cause harm to the U.S. Government and limit remedies.
Incentives. Best Practice – Use incentives when there are clear, measurable performance metrics or critical dates that are important to the program. Lessons Learned O Incentives work: On the plus side they focus contractors on what the program considers most important. On the down side, they may cause contractors to pay less attention to the areas that aren’t incentivized. O Incentives need to be achievable. Contractors will only focus on achieving an incentive as long as they believe it is achievable. O Schedule incentives are a two edged sword and their interaction with contract type is important. If achievable and in a fixed price contract, they work well. If used in a cost type contract, they may cause the contractor to chase the schedule and ignore costs. O Consider the use of incentives. Discussion should include whether or not performance beyond the specification requirements is of value to the warfighter and whether simply changing the specification based on offers or the use of incentives is the better option. O Consider the effects schedule, technical and cost incentives have on each other. Contract type makes a huge difference in developing incentives. O Consider whether the proposal describes how the offeror will achieve the aspects of the contract that are being incentivized.
For Services Contracts, a COR shall be appointed unless the three conditions in PGI 201.602-2 apply
0 Replies
View Discussion
May 8, 2024 - 08:21pm
QUESTION
PGI 201.602-2: A COR shall be appointed for services contractors. However, Contracting Officers may exempt service contracts from this requirement when the following three conditions are met:
(1) The contract will be awarded using simplified acquisition procedures;
(2) The requirement is not complex; and
(3) The contracting officer documents the file, in writing, with the specific reasons why the appointment of a COR is unnecessary.
Writing your work statement, or an email avoid the gobbledygook
0 Replies
View Discussion
August 23, 2022 - 06:27am
QUESTION
Two resources I use a lot. The PWS Writing Guidelines and the plain language dot gov site. They mostly complement one another although the plain language guide will tell you to use Must for required actions and the PWS Writing Guidelines will say to use Shall. Check out the Plain Language web site. NOTE: you may have to click on the announcement title to access the link. Look for helpful links there to "Use [of] simple words and phrases." You'll find:
Don't Say
Say
a and/or b
a, b, or both
accompany
go with
accomplish
carry out OR do
accorded
given
accordingly
so
accrue
add OR gain
accurate
correct OR exact OR right
And that's only partially through the As on the list. My favorite is utilize. Why not just use? There are more guides to download or browse and the law and regulations are there too. Look for the No-Gobbledygook awards (a bit of history trivia perhaps).
PWS Writing Guidelines may be found with a search here on DAU's web site, or click through the link above. Do you have a favorite writing tip?
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is authorized to contract with local law enforcement agencies to provide additional patrols during peak recreation seasons. USACE Lakes and Rivers Nashville District (LRN) uses Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) to award a firm-fixed price, commercial service contract for each project location (24 total contracts). Most contracts include a base period of performance and 2 or 3 option years to maintain continued patrols. What types of acquisition methods are other Districts / Agencies using to contract with local law enforcement agencies? OR is anyone contracting private security companies?
SCENARIO
COMMENTS
AFBIT Lite is a tool that pulls contracts from FPDS, but on version lets you look for nearby organizations doing similar work based on zip code. The tool is an online version of Tableau and is a bit clunky to use, but it's easier in my opinion than the advanced search on FPDS.Gov. The closest contract (W9124P20C0012) for PSC S206 is out of Huntsville, an Army contract with Controlled F.O.R.C.E. Inc. You can find AFBIT Lite with a search on DAU.edu.
A quick search on GSA's Acquisition Gateway turned up Tech Ops II. This is a Best In Class vehicle, so a plus for meeting category management goals. Seems to be about technologies for security, the extent that services of private security companies can be used is unknown, but the contacts are in the FAQ. Unfortunately, the site is scheduled for an update and the link may only be good until Sep. 30, 2023. (NOTE: you may have to CAC in to view this site)
GSA's Schedule 84 may fit the bill for another strategy for acquiring the needed services.
For PSC S206 there's NAICS 561612 Security Guards and Patrol Services seems to fit your requirment. I found this using psctool.us <-that's the URL...
You can search FPDS for others acquiring similar services.
Suffice to say that private security companies are used extensively.
I would like to provide a standard template for Security Risk Assessments that small businesses can use to comply with their TRICARE credentialing agreements with the Defense Health Agency. The only SRA tool I know of for federal healthcare programs is provided by HHS:
Have you ran into OTA's before? If OTA's (Other Transactional Agreement) are not subject to the FAR? What guidance do we adhere to for OTA's in regards to GFP?
Any help or point in the right direction would be greatly appreciated.
I have limited experience with OTs from R&D efforts. DAU has an OT Community here: Pages - Other Transactions Community Homepage (dau.edu). I looked and didn't see anything for property. You can talk to your agreements officer, but if its a services acquisition, I wouldn't recommend using an OT.
GAO Bid Protest Report contains statistics and analysis for FY22. A summary of the most prevalent grounds for sustaining protests is included. Of the protests resolved on the merits during FY22, GAO sustained 13% of those protests. Our review shows that the most prevalent reasons for sustaining protests during the 2022 fiscal year were: (1) unreasonable technical evaluation; (2) flawed selection decision; and (3) flawed solicitation. It is important to note that a significant number of protests filed with our Office do not reach a decision on the merits because agencies voluntarily take corrective action in response to the protest rather than defend the protest on the merits. Agencies need not, and do not, report any of the myriad reasons they decide to take voluntary corrective action.
CCON 025 recently deployed. You may want to try earning this credential even if not in the contracting career field. Check out my blog and follow the link to the concept card for CCON 025.
Surveillance reports provide a basis for communicating interim contractor performance or identified problems. A recent finding of the DoDIG was that CORs were not submitting surveillance reports in accordance with their Designation Letter. (See Audit of the Oversight of ENCORE III Information Technology Service Task Orders (DODIG-2023-067)) DoDI 5000.72 requires CORs to submit surveillance reports to communicate contractor performance to contracting officers. For timely surveillance reports, a monthly report is desirable and should be in the COR Designation Letter. CORs need to report performance problems immediately because many remedies are time sensitive and delays may cause harm to the U.S. Government and limit remedies.
Proposed stream-lined Defense Resourcing System (DRS) recommended to replace Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution (PPBE) Process
View Announcement
Section 1004 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (NDAA; P.L. 117-81) established the 14-member Commission to examine the effectiveness of the PPBE process, consider alternatives, and make legislative and policy recommendations. On July 18, 2024, the Congressional Research Service published Defense Primer: Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution (PPBE) Process, an update on the commission's work including a recommendation to replace the PBBE process with a stream-lined Defense Resourcing System (DRS).
COR file review requirements (CUI, cybersecurity and annual file reviews)
View Announcement
Memorandum provides guidance on Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) file review requirements. Look for this content to be added to future updates to the DFARS Procedures, Guidance, and Information (PGI), and Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 5000.72, DoD Standard for Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) Certification.
Memo addresses “Audit of the DoD’s Implementation and Oversight of the Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Program” Report No. DoDIG-2023-078, which identified deficiencies in contractor implementation and subsequently COR oversight of CUI training requirements as applied to contractors.
CUPID will allow program-related data to be easily discovered, linked retrieved and referenced. This is a refinement of the legacy Program Number or PNO.
The DFARS PGI will be updated to establish the requirements for the FPDS reporting. Effective immediately, contracting personnel shall enter the CUPID 3-position code in field 8B, DoD Acquisition Program.
In addition, the Procurement Data Standard (PDS) and Purchase Request data Standard (PRDS) have been modified to allow the CUPID to be identified as a reference number in contracts and purchase requests.
The prior term Acquisition Program Unique Identifier is now obsolete and should NOT be used.
Vision: DOD is a data-centric organization that uses data at speed and scale for operational advantage and increased efficiency.
Focus Areas: The strategy emphasizes the need to work closely with users in the operational community, particularly the warfighter. Initial areas of focus include:
Joint All Domain Operations – using data for advantage on the battlefield
Senior Leader Decision Support – using data to improve DOD management
Business Analytics – using data to drive informed decisions at all echelons
Check out the FACT SHEET for DOD Data Strategy: Unleashing Data to Advance the National Defense Strategy with 8 guiding principles:
2024 NDAA Section 809 – Pilot Program for Anything-as-a-Service
View Announcement
Section 809 directs the Secretary of Defense to establish a pilot program to explore the use of consumption-based solutions to address DoD needs. In particular, the pilot program is to result in contracts and other agreements for "anything-as-a-service," which is defined as a model under which a technology-supported capability is provided using any combination of software, hardware or equipment, data, and labor services. Importantly, under this pilot program, the "anything-as-a-service" capability provided to DoD must be metered and billed based on actual usage of fixed-price units. Additionally, no later than June 30, 2024, the Secretary of Defense must provide a briefing to the congressional defense committees on the implementation of the pilot program. As Congress's Joint Explanatory Statement emphasizes, this pilot program is another effort to promote continuous competition and better business practices at the DoD.
Contract Protest Diagnostic Tool is a Data-Driven Application to Proactively Identify Contracting Errors and Mitigate Protest Exposure developed by MITRE in partnership with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI).
"Snorkel" Explore protest grounds and receive high-level summaries
Quick Dive assessment of specific protest risks
Deep Dive complete assessment of protest risk across all protest topics
DoD has adopted the service contract reporting process used by other Federal agencies and no longer requires contractor reporting in the Enterprise Contractor Manpower
Reporting Application (ECMRA). This change enables DoD to use the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) to obtain a majority of the information required by 10 U.S.C. 2330a, Procurement of services: tracking of purchases. FPDS does not provide data on the direct labor hours expended and dollar amounts invoiced for contracted services. Therefore, DFARS will require applicable contractors to enter the labor hours and dollar amounts in the System for Award Management (SAM) [See the entity reporting application on SAM], which is the process used by other Federal agencies, in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) subpart 4.17.
The rule requires reporting for only four service acquisition portfolio groups: Logistics management services, equipment-related services, knowledge-based services, and electronics and communications services. SAM further specifies reporting required for contracts > or = $3M for Service Contracts with any PSC that starts with a letter AND belongs to any of the following Categories in the Government-Wide Category Structure: 1, 2, 3.3, 5, 7.1, 7.2, 7.5, 7.6, 9, 18, and 19.
You may recall the annual Inventory of Contracted Services (ICS) and the recommendation from the 809 panel in Volume 3 under Section 6 which addressed a variety of compliance topics. Recommendation 90 was to allow DoD to develop a replacement approach to the inventory of contracted services requirement under 10 U.S.C. § 2330a. Here's the streamlined approach, the Inventory for Services Contracts.
SRRB assesses the Mission Need, Strategic Alignment, Issues and Risks, Workforce Analysis, Relationship to other Requirements, Projected Cost, Prioritization, Contract and Work Functions (see DoD Handbook of Contract Function Checklists for Service Acquisitions), Metrics.
Comprehensive reviews (as opposed to individual requirements) enhance the quality of requirements prioritization and services requirements risk assessments
MFTs: Track SRRB approval and SRRB Chair guidance/mandates and include in the Acquisition Strategy
The Department of the Air Forces uses a Requirements Approval Document (RAD) process described in DAFI 63-138.
A RAD is required before a Dept. of the Air Force organization may establish an inter-agency agreement (see Interagency Acquisitions) to fund a requirement.
Placing Category Management into Dept. of Navy (DON) Acquisition Policies Raises Awareness/Compliance
SRRBs will be used to help the Department identify the best methodology for forecasting budget needs for service contracts across Future Years Defense Program. (Defense Pricing, Contracting, and Acquisition Policy)
Department of the Air Force, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, and USSOCOM have established a Program Executive Office (PEO) or a similar structure, to provide oversight of services acquisitions. This approach enables achievement of efficiencies across the organization, increased acquisition of services expertise, and standardization.
DARPA has initiated the "Bringing Classified Innovation to Defense and Government Systems" (BRIDGES) program, helping small businesses obtain Facilities Clearances. BRIDGES aims to accommodate companies, that demonstrate they can provide innovation and value to the DoD, with the means to obtain a facility clearance and interact directly with DoD customers at classified levels.
Reliance on Defense Acquisition University (DAU) for training on services acquisition. DAU's Mission Assistance services provide organization-specific services acquisition training, and in certain instances, have DAU instructors embedded in the component to meet their training needs. Strategic partnerships with DAU have enabled organizations to train their non-acquisition personnel.
Department of the Air Force, Washington Headquarters Services, Defense Logistics Agency, and Defense Health Agency have established Centers of Excellence for services acquisition support, providing a central location for expert advice and insight for services multifunctional teams.
Department of the Air Force and the Defense Health Agency have mandated use of certified Program Managers for certain Services Category (S-CAT) Programs categories. This requirement ensures skillful oversight of an organization's largest services acquisitions, similar to other programs within the Adaptive Acquisition Framework.
To maximize contract awards to small businesses, numerous components touted their outreach to the public, to include external-facing websites for small businesses interested in doing business with DoD. These websites include, but are not limited to, forecasted awards, tools on how to do business with the Department, notices of industry days and other outreach events.
Given continuing use of assisted acquisition and fluctuating service fees, one component negotiated an organization-wide flat percentage fee for assisted acquisitions. This resulted in cost savings and allowed for consistent outyear budgeting.
Use of automation and business tools to better manage services acquisitions, to include their Services Requirements Review Boards (SRRBs). These tools yield efficiencies, enable resource tracking, and streamline collaboration.
Defense Threat Reduction Agency and Defense Intelligence Agency use automated tools for integrating and aligning their SRRBs with the Planning, Programming, Budgeting & Execution (PPBE) process.
Definition of Best Practices: Best practices, as defined in the Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 37.501, are techniques that agencies may use to help detect problems in the acquisition, management and administration of service contracts. For DoD, the Services Acquisition Pathwayis a great start to learn about the DoD 7-Step SA process as is DAU's Service Acquisition Mall. For federal civilian agencies, see Steps to Performance-Based Acquisition (SPBA).
Pathway Gates. Select each for Best Practices and Lessons Learned.
Industry Best Practices are unique and innovative ways industry makes sound business decisions and contracts for services they need. Best Practices are not legal documents, but may be viewed as persuasive guidance in the management and administration of government contracts.
Peer Review Checklist for Small Business. Used to conduct a pre-award peer review of the acquisition documents (solicitation, acquisition plan, and source selection plan)
Back to Basics (BtB) BTB significantly streamlined the certification framework and re-focused training resources for the Defense Acquisition Workforce.
Want to Preview DAU On Line Training courses? Select Preview Training
DAU Credentials. DAU deployed the first four credentials in FY2020, including two Acquisition of Services credentials. There are 60+ credentials available!
DAU Partnerships. Defense Acquisition University works with over fifty external colleges and universities in granting credit to workforce members who have completed DAU courses. Partnerships provide opportunities to maximize academic accomplishments by receiving credit for DAU courses toward an undergraduate, graduate, or certificate program.
DAU Equivalency Program. The Defense Acquisition University (DAU) provides the opportunity for other organizations (colleges and universities, DoD schools, other federal agencies, commercial vendors, and professional societies) to offer courses, programs or certifications which DAU will accept as equivalent to one or more DAU courses if, upon evaluation of the organization's materials and standards, they adequately address the DAU course learning outcomes for a select DAU course(s).
Credentials for DoD Acquisition and Non-Acquisition Workforce Performing Services Acquisitions
Total CLPs
CACQ 001 Services Acquisition Team Member: Non-Acquisition Workforce
39
CACQ 002 Services Acquisition Team Member: Acquisition Workforce
Services Acquisition Workshop (SAW) WSM 012. The SAW is typically a 3-4 four-day workshop for an intact MFT conducted at team's location using the team's documentation. It is a facilitated, hands-on workshop designed to help the MFT work through the seven-step service acquisition process. For more information, see DAU's SAW Talking Paper.
Work Statement Workshop (SOW, SOO, PWS) WSM 009. Provides an overview of the function of the Work Statement in the acquisition process and a procedure for planning, developing, and writing Work Statements.
This Electronic tools, ore-tools page provides a select list of available online tools and resources relating to the acquisition of services. NOTE: more tools may be found by selecting "Resources" and selecting tools catalog from the DAU home page.
DAU AI Toolkit A new AI resource - Artificial Intelligence Resources
The first function is the nomination, designation and revocation of Contracting Officer Representatives (CORs) appointed to a contract awarded by a Department of Defense Agency.
The second function is to provide visibility into the COR's contract monitoring and surveillance of contracts for which a COR had been designated to improve contract administration and performance surveillance as mandated by FAR Part 46.
Contracting Subway Map; excellent resource to accompany the 7-Step Services Acquisition Process
Corrective Action Plan Evaluation Worksheet. DCMA tool to evaluate Contractor Corrective Action Plans (CAPs). Provides evaluative questions to assist in assessing CAPs and a better documented oversight process.
Provision and Clause Matrix. The Provision and Clause matrix is a spreadsheet of all FAR, DFARS, Department of Veterans Affairs Acquisition Regulation (VAAR), and Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) provisions and clauses. It also includes guidance on the use of provisions and clauses contained in DoD class deviations. A help video is available by following the link provided in the DAU Tools catalog.
Market Research ACQuipedia Article - Also use to find training, related ACQuipedia articles, and other resources such as SD-5 Market Research, or the Market Intelligence Guide.
Market Research Template. Word Document template based on the 2017 Market Research Guide above with updated links and guidance.
Market Research Methods Tool - This tool provides for different methods that can be used to help in both your strategic or tactical market research for a requirement.
STEP 3, Market Research - Detailed steps and a video on the Service Acquisition Mall. Easily navigate through the 7-Step Services Acquisition Process.
Substantive changes to Title 10 were made on January 1, 2022. For services acquisition, the crosswalk from the old sections to new with their links is provided in the Table below:
DEFENSE STANDARDIZATION PROGRAM. The purpose of this document is to provide DoD and other Federal personnel involved in the acquisition process with practical guidance on using market research to ensure the acquisition of products and services that will best serve the government's needs. Use the link below to download a copy of the SD-5
A list of metrics organized by Demand Management, Supplier Management, and Process Management useful for any acquisition, but particularly services acquisitions.
The Defense Pricing and Contracting (DPC) PMR program is designed to enhance the performance of the Department’s contracting function. DCMA leads PMRs at Other Defense Agencies (ODAs) and 4th Estate Contracting Activities using teams of volunteers from the Contracting Competency throughout the Department. The reviews assess:
Compliance with statutes, regulations and policies;
Structure, processes and practices of the Contracting office as they relate to meeting mission requirements; and
Training, morale, and other environmental factors that enable success.
Each FY, the best practices and lessons learned are combined into an annual Newsletter that is distributed Department-wide. The annual Newsletters dating back to FY 2014 are available
Provides a practical common sense approach to procuring Advisory and Assistance Services with best practices. The guide, dated 2000, was prepared by the Inspections and Evaluation Roundtable at the request of the Inspection and Evaluation Committee.