Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
 
      

Skip Navigation LinksTopic

Started: 12/12/2019 7:59 PM
Picture Placeholder: THEODORE MCHUGH
THEODORE MCHUGH
AR 190-11 vs AR 190-13

​Current publications state we must put that indivuals have been screened IAW AR 190-11 in the 1687 remarks block.  Should we now put AR 190-13 due to ALARACT 062/2019?  What say you?




Picture Placeholder: THEODORE MCHUGH
  • THEODORE MCHUGH
/_layouts/15/images/person.gif" alt="Picture Placeholder: THEODORE MCHUGH" />
THEODORE MCHUGH

​Current publications state we must put that indivuals have been screened IAW AR 190-11 in the 1687 remarks block.  Should we now put AR 190-13 due to ALARACT 062/2019?  What say you?




112/12/2019 7:59 PM12/12/2019 7:59 PMNoAsk the Community
55.1750875929762
16/30/2010 10:19 PM1
MICHAEL LIMA
Edited: 12/17/2019 7:46 PM
Picture Placeholder: MICHAEL LIMA
MICHAEL LIMA

​​Keep AR 190-11, the ALARACT still uses Reference A IAW AR 190-11 (4.D. (U)).   

Picture Placeholder: MICHAEL LIMA
  • MICHAEL LIMA
/_layouts/15/images/person.gif" alt="Picture Placeholder: MICHAEL LIMA" />
MICHAEL LIMA

​​Keep AR 190-11, the ALARACT still uses Reference A IAW AR 190-11 (4.D. (U)).   

THEODORE MCHUGH96012/17/2019 7:46 PM12/17/2019 7:46 PM
7/5/2017 1:42 AM

 

false,false,2