Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
 
      

Science and Technology Management Community Homepage

  
  
Description
  
  
  
  
Policy and GuidancePolicy and Guidance
DoD and Service regulations, policies, guidebooks, handbooks, etc.
Policy and GuidanceIn page navigation
TrainingTraining
STM-related training
Training In page navigation
Reference LibraryReference Library
Articles, papers, reports, books, etc.
Reference LibraryIn page navigation
Best Practices, Lessons Learned, & ToolsBest Practices, Lessons Learned & Tools
STM-related best practices, lessons learned, and tools
Best Practices, Lessons Learned & ToolsIn page navigation
Technology Transition ProgramsTechnology Transition Programs
Short descriptions of and links to DoD technology transition programs
Technology Transition ProgramsIn page navigation
S&T OrganizationsS&T Organizations
Short descriptions of and links to DoD and Service S&T organizations
S&T OrganizationsIn page navigation
DoD S&T Communities of Interest (CoIs)DoD S&T Communities of Interest (CoIs)
Short description of and link to the CoI site (CAC required)
DoD S&T Communities of Interest (CoIs)In page navigation
Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD)Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD)
This page is currently under construction.
Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD)In page navigation
ActionsUse SHIFT+ENTER to open the menu (new window).Open Menu
  
Picture: DARREN RHYNE
  • DARREN RHYNE
010/22/2020 11:31 AM

The Nov-Dec 2020 issue of Defense Acquisition Magazine contains an interesting article by Stephen Speciale and Diane Sidebottom on a little-used acquisition authority called "Procurement for Experimental Purposes" (PEP).​ The article, "The Next Little-Known Flexible Acquisition Authority," labels PEP a "companion authority" to Other Transactions (OTs). It was authorized by Congress in FY94 (10 U.S.C. Section 2373) alongside the authorization for OTs for Prototypes (the old "Section 845" authority, I believe). However, its existence is not as well-known as OTs, in some part because its use is not as lowly and widely delegated by OSD. Also, the article states that its use is limited to nine categories.

"The Secretary of Defense and the Secretaries of the military departments may each buy ordnance, signal, chemical activity, transportation, energy, medical, space-flight, telecommunications, and aeronautical supplies, including parts, accessories, and designs thereof, that the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary concerned considers necessary for experimental or test purposes in the development of the best supplies that are needed for the national defense."

If any of you have used the PEP authority, please respond to this post and convey your experience with it.

10/22/2020 11:31 AMNo
  
Picture: DARREN RHYNE
  • DARREN RHYNE
010/21/2020 11:59 AM

​On 21 Oct 20, DTIC published a clarification regarding the new Federal Marking Framework for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). The DTIC bulletin can be accessed at:

https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDODDTIC/bulletins/2a6cdac

The bulletin contains a link to the 21-page training guide on CUI Markings dated 3 Sep 20. It also contains a reference to DoDI 5230.24, Distribution Statements on Technical Documents, incorporating Change 3 dated 15 Oct 18. I've provided a link to that instruction in this post that was not in the DTIC bulletin. The bulletin also contains a link to find out more about submitting documents to DTIC

10/21/2020 11:59 AMNo
  
Picture: DARREN RHYNE
  • DARREN RHYNE
010/21/2020 8:46 AM

​The Navy is opening its first overseas "tech bridge" location in London, UK, according to an Inside Defense article published 21 Oct 20. See article at:

https://insidedefense.com/daily-news/geurts-says-navy-will-stand-tech-bridge-london

Any thoughts from anyone on this? Seems like an AFWERX or DIU kind of effort to me.

10/21/2020 8:46 AMNo
  
Picture: DARREN RHYNE
  • DARREN RHYNE
010/16/2020 11:44 PM

On 15 Oct 20, the White House published an 18-page document titled "National Strategy for Critical and Emerging Technologies" dated October 2020. A White House press release accompanied the document and the Air Force Association posted an article about it, too. The document references the 2017 National Security Strategy as the visionary foundation upon which this new strategy is built..

For the purposes of this strategy, critical and emerging technologies (C&ET) are defined as "those technologies that have been identified and assessed by the National Security Council (NSC) to be criticalm, or to potentially become critical, to the United States' national security advantage, including military, intelligence, and economic advantages."

The strategy discusses a three-fold approach to prioritize its way-ahead. For the highest priority technology areas, the U.S. will lead. The U.S. will remain a technology peer with its allies and partners in other high-priority technology areas. For some emerging technologies that are globally diffuse or are too early in the R&D phase to have clearly identified implications for U.S. national security, a risk management approach will be applied. It mentions the four risk mitigation methods of avoid, reduce, accept, or transfer.

The strategy contains two "pillars of success" with priority actions stated for each pillar. However, the strategy contains no details on any of the priority actions; it only lists them, in no particular order, for each pillar. A lone annex contains the 20 U.S. Government Critical and Emerging Technologies List but, again, there are no details on these technologies in the strategy.

Pillar I: Promote the National Security Innovation Base (NSIB). There are 13 priority actions for this pillar, not listed here for brevity.

Pillar II: Protect Technology Advantage. There are 9 priority actions for this pillar, not listed here for brevity. Most, if not all, can be found in the recent DoDI 5000.83, "Technology and Program Protection to Maintain Technological Advantage" published 20 Jul 20.

The 20 technologies in the C&ET list in the annex are arranged alphabetically. Many of these are reflected in the DoD Communities of Interest (CoIs) [see the CoIs Tier 1 Taxonomy and Descriptions for more info] and DoD Modernization Priorities [the DTIC R&E Gateway Techipedia has further info on these at the CUI level]. Many of these technologies are also mentioned in the annual joint OSTP/OMB memo "Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Administration Research and Development Budget Priorities and Cross-cuting Actions" dated 14 Aug 20.

  • Advanced Computing
  • Advanced Conventional Weapons Technologies
  • Advanced Engineering Materials
  • Advanced Manufacturing
  • Advanced Sensing
  • Aero-Engine Technologies
  • Agricultural Technologies
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Autonomous Systems
  • Biotechnologies
  • Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Mitigation Technologies
  • Communication and Networking Technologies
  • Data Science and Storage
  • Distributed Ledger Technologies
  • Energy Technologies
  • Human-Machine Interfaces
  • Medical and Public Health Technologies
  • Quantum Information Science
  • Semiconductors and Microelectronics
  • Space Technologies
[end of list]
10/16/2020 11:44 PMNo
  
Picture: DARREN RHYNE
  • DARREN RHYNE
010/16/2020 3:17 PM

On 28 Sep 20, the DSB cleared for public release a 16-page executive summary for "21st Centure Multi-Domain Effects" task force report dated September 2020. It is directed related to the term multi-domain operations (MDO).

The summary contains 12 recommendations which, for brevity, will only be listed here by their short titles.

  1. MD C3 - Resilient C3 Architecture
  2. MD C3 - Readiness Levels for C3
  3. PD&A - Preplanned, Delegated Authorities and ROE
  4. PD&A - Training and Exercises
  5. I&W/ISR - Fusion Cell C3 Centers
  6. ​Cyber security should be a top priority for all commercial and military systems.
  7. Operational Capabilities - Rapid Information Integration
  8. Operational Capabilities - Multi-Modal ISR, Targeting, and C3 Architecture
  9. Open Architecture Acquisition Strategies
  10. Implementation - To Improve the Requirements Development Process for MDO
  11. Implementation - "De-linearize" Acquisition Process
  12. Modeling and Simulation (M&S) for Acquisition Streamlining
[end of recommendations]
10/16/2020 3:17 PMNo

 Featured Multi-Media

 DAU Community Help Web Part

Tip: Sign in and then click 'Join this community' to become a member of this site.

 Director's Blog

Darren Rhyne

Darren Rhyne

Sep
10

OSD Issues Updated DoDD 5000.01 The DAS
September 10, 2020
On 9 Sep 20, the DepSecDef issued the​ updated DoDD 5000.01 titled &..

Sep
08

Space System Cybersecurity Directive Issued
September 08, 2020
​​On 4 Sep 20, President Trump issued Space Policy Directive 5 (SPD-..

Sep
03

GAO Reports on DoD Use of Independent Research and Development
September 03, 2020
On 3 Sep 20, the GAO issued a new report on Independent Research and..

What's happening
  
  
DARREN RHYNEModerator/Editor
MARTIN FALKCommunity Leader